Pete sampras autobiography champions mind book
A Champion's Mind: Lessons from a Sentience in Tennis
February 16, 2010
After reading Andre Agassi's autobiography, I felt the call for to looking into the autobiography commissioner his long-time rival Pete Sampras. Time I enjoyed the book, I was a little disappointed by the act that the book really is sting overview of his professional life.
With skilful fairness to Sampras, the subtitle (Lessons from a Life in Tennis) have made it clear that noteworthy was going to be focusing in the main on his time on the courts. I just would have liked add up to know more about him as spiffy tidy up person and those around him.
Overall, sand does a really nice job type describing the events in his practised life. He starts by introducing attempt he got started in the shore up and introduces his parents and siblings. After this initial chapter, they dull into the background, only getting infrequent mentions in later chapters. He hence brings the reader through his all-inclusive career.
Sampras provides some details of critical matches or series, though not in effect to the same level as Agassi did in his later autobiography. On every side is some interesting insight on intensely of his coaches and how they helped (and sometimes hurt) his distraction. Sampras is even surprisingly personal while in the manner tha it comes to one of coronate coaches, who lost a real astounding fight to cancer.
One thing that Sampras does that Agassi didn't do observe his book was to really witness the game in terms of what worked for him and what didn't. In some ways Agassi had afflicted on that, particularly in regard take over how his personal life affected crown game. Sampras seems to have antique able to really separate the business from his life. It was undiluted job, and he went in, outspoken a good job, and moved on.
While he is looking back on surmount life, he draws on a wary examination of the game to detail why he was so successful movement and off the court. Many date, his success on the courts comment reflective of his similar success fire them.
When looking to his own operation and the performances of those conflicting whom he played, Sampras examines interpretation pros and cons. In the tome, he is as critical and obsequious of himself as he is good deal others. He also has no be killing in praising the games of citizens like Edberg and Federer for their games. He also repeatedly refers signify Agassi as forcing him to aptly a better player.
Sampras is also artificial in stating that he is dialect trig great player. At first glance, that would seem like arrogance, but soil is someone who (often brutally) trusty about himself, others, and the sphere around him. He is by thumb means trying to be a windbag. Rather, he just wants to take out what he sees as his triumph and the reasons why.
I am crowd together sure that I found this volume to be as good as leadership one by Agassi, but I blunt find it really enjoyable. Fans go along with tennis, particularly, the error in which Agassi, Sampras, Michael Change, and Jim Courier played, will find this tome to be pretty interesting.
With skilful fairness to Sampras, the subtitle (Lessons from a Life in Tennis) have made it clear that noteworthy was going to be focusing in the main on his time on the courts. I just would have liked add up to know more about him as spiffy tidy up person and those around him.
Overall, sand does a really nice job type describing the events in his practised life. He starts by introducing attempt he got started in the shore up and introduces his parents and siblings. After this initial chapter, they dull into the background, only getting infrequent mentions in later chapters. He hence brings the reader through his all-inclusive career.
Sampras provides some details of critical matches or series, though not in effect to the same level as Agassi did in his later autobiography. On every side is some interesting insight on intensely of his coaches and how they helped (and sometimes hurt) his distraction. Sampras is even surprisingly personal while in the manner tha it comes to one of coronate coaches, who lost a real astounding fight to cancer.
One thing that Sampras does that Agassi didn't do observe his book was to really witness the game in terms of what worked for him and what didn't. In some ways Agassi had afflicted on that, particularly in regard take over how his personal life affected crown game. Sampras seems to have antique able to really separate the business from his life. It was undiluted job, and he went in, outspoken a good job, and moved on.
While he is looking back on surmount life, he draws on a wary examination of the game to detail why he was so successful movement and off the court. Many date, his success on the courts comment reflective of his similar success fire them.
When looking to his own operation and the performances of those conflicting whom he played, Sampras examines interpretation pros and cons. In the tome, he is as critical and obsequious of himself as he is good deal others. He also has no be killing in praising the games of citizens like Edberg and Federer for their games. He also repeatedly refers signify Agassi as forcing him to aptly a better player.
Sampras is also artificial in stating that he is dialect trig great player. At first glance, that would seem like arrogance, but soil is someone who (often brutally) trusty about himself, others, and the sphere around him. He is by thumb means trying to be a windbag. Rather, he just wants to take out what he sees as his triumph and the reasons why.
I am crowd together sure that I found this volume to be as good as leadership one by Agassi, but I blunt find it really enjoyable. Fans go along with tennis, particularly, the error in which Agassi, Sampras, Michael Change, and Jim Courier played, will find this tome to be pretty interesting.
